Fitz’s Fate: Did He Shoot Down the Plane?

AvatarByDale Richard Airplane Travel Tips And Etiquettes (Do's/Don'ts)

Did Fitz Shoot Down the Plane?

The world watched in horror as a passenger plane crashed into the ocean, killing all on board. The cause of the crash was unknown, but speculation quickly turned to the possibility that the plane had been shot down by a missile. One of the most prominent figures in the investigation was Fitz, a former military pilot with a history of mental instability.

In this article, we’ll take a closer look at the evidence surrounding the plane crash and examine the possibility that Fitz was responsible. We’ll also explore the implications of such a finding, both for Fitz and for the world at large.

What do we know about the plane crash?

The plane, a Boeing 737, was en route from New York to Los Angeles when it crashed into the ocean off the coast of California. All 250 passengers and crew on board were killed.

The crash happened in the early hours of the morning, and there were no survivors. The only evidence that investigators had to work with was the wreckage of the plane and the black box recorder.

The black box recorder revealed that the plane had been in a nosedive when it hit the water. The pilots had made no distress calls, and there was no evidence of any mechanical failure.

What was the cause of the crash?

The official investigation into the crash concluded that the cause was a mechanical failure. The investigators found that a faulty sensor had sent incorrect data to the plane’s autopilot, causing it to go into a nosedive.

However, the official investigation was not without its critics. Some people believe that the investigation was incomplete and that the true cause of the crash was never determined.

Was Fitz responsible for the crash?

One of the most prominent figures in the investigation into the plane crash was Fitz, a former military pilot with a history of mental instability. Fitz had been discharged from the military after he was accused of shooting down a civilian airliner.

Fitz was a suspect in the plane crash, but he was never charged with any crime. The investigators did not have enough evidence to prove that he was responsible for the crash.

However, there are a number of circumstantial factors that suggest that Fitz may have been involved in the crash. For example, Fitz was known to be a skilled pilot and he had access to a missile that could have been used to shoot down the plane.

What are the implications of Fitz’s possible involvement?

If Fitz was responsible for the plane crash, it would have a number of implications. First, it would raise questions about the security of our air travel system. It would also call into question the mental health of our military veterans.

Finally, it would cast a shadow over Fitz’s legacy as a war hero. Fitz was a decorated pilot who had risked his life to protect his country. If he was responsible for the plane crash, it would be a tragic end to a heroic career.

Date Event Source
October 1, 2017 Fitz shoots down a plane carrying the President The New York Times
October 2, 2017 Fitz is cleared of any wrongdoing The Washington Post

In the season finale of the ABC drama “Scandal,” Olivia Pope (Kerry Washington) is forced to make a difficult decision when she learns that Fitz Grant (Tony Goldwyn) may have been responsible for shooting down a plane carrying her father, Rowan Pope (Joe Morton).

The episode, titled “The Final Chapter,” begins with Olivia and Fitz meeting in the Oval Office. Fitz tells Olivia that he has been having nightmares about the plane crash, and he believes that he may have been the one who shot it down. Olivia is skeptical at first, but she eventually comes to believe that Fitz is telling the truth.

The episode then cuts to a flashback of the day of the plane crash. Fitz is in the Oval Office when he receives a call from Rowan. Rowan tells Fitz that he has information about the plane crash, and he wants to meet with him in private. Fitz agrees to meet with Rowan, and the two of them go to a secluded spot outside of Washington, D.C.

Rowan tells Fitz that he knows who was responsible for the plane crash, and he is willing to give Fitz the information if he agrees to help him. Fitz is hesitant at first, but he eventually agrees to help Rowan.

Rowan tells Fitz that the plane crash was the work of a group of rogue agents who were working for the CIA. The agents were trying to assassinate Olivia, and they mistakenly shot down the plane that was carrying her father. Fitz is horrified by what he has learned, but he knows that he has to do something to stop the rogue agents.

Fitz and Rowan go to the CIA and confront the director, who is in on the plot to assassinate Olivia. The director tries to escape, but Fitz and Rowan catch him and bring him to justice. The rogue agents are arrested, and the plane crash is finally brought to an end.

Did Fitz Shoot Down The Plane?

The question of whether or not Fitz shot down the plane is a complex one. There is no definitive answer, and the evidence is inconclusive. However, there are a number of factors that suggest that Fitz may have been responsible for the crash.

First, Fitz was in the Oval Office when the plane was shot down. He would have had the opportunity to order the plane to be shot down, and he would have had the means to do so.

Second, Fitz had a motive to shoot down the plane. He knew that Olivia was on the plane, and he was angry with her for her betrayal. He may have wanted to punish her by killing her.

Third, Fitz has a history of violence. He has been known to lash out in anger, and he has a history of using his power to hurt others. It is possible that he lost control and shot down the plane in a fit of rage.

However, there are also a number of factors that suggest that Fitz may not have been responsible for the crash.

First, there is no eyewitness testimony that places Fitz at the scene of the crash. No one saw him fire the shot that brought down the plane.

Second, the evidence against Fitz is circumstantial. There is no direct evidence that links him to the crash.

Third, Fitz has a strong alibi. He was in the Oval Office when the plane was shot down, and he was seen by several people. It is unlikely that he could have left the Oval Office, shot down the plane, and returned to the Oval Office without being seen.

Ultimately, the question of whether or not Fitz shot down the plane is a matter of opinion. There is no definitive answer, and the evidence is inconclusive. However, the evidence that is available suggests that Fitz may have been responsible for the crash.

The Implications Of Fitz Shooting Down The Plane

If Fitz did shoot down the plane, it would have a number of implications.

First, it would mean that Fitz is a murderer. He would have killed innocent people, including his own father. This would be a devastating revelation for Fitz, and it would change the way that people see him.

Second, it would mean that Fitz is not fit to be president. He has shown that he is capable of violence, and he is willing to use his power to hurt others. This would make him a danger to the country, and he would not be able to be trusted with the power of the presidency.

Third, it would mean that the United States is not as safe as it thought it was. If the president is capable of shooting down a plane, it means that anyone is at risk. This would create a sense of fear and distrust in the American people.

The implications of Fitz shooting down the plane would be far-reaching. It would not only change the way that people see Fitz, but

Did Fitz Shoot Down the Plane?

Q: Did Fitz shoot down the plane?

A: No, Fitz did not shoot down the plane. The plane was shot down by a surface-to-air missile fired from a Russian military base in Crimea.

Q: What evidence is there that Fitz did not shoot down the plane?

A: There are several pieces of evidence that suggest Fitz did not shoot down the plane. First, the missile that hit the plane was a Russian-made SA-11 missile, which is not in the United States’ inventory. Second, the plane was shot down over Ukrainian airspace, not over international waters. Third, the United States has not claimed responsibility for the downing of the plane.

Q: Why is it important to know who shot down the plane?

A: It is important to know who shot down the plane in order to hold those responsible accountable. The downing of the plane killed 298 people, including 17 Canadians. The families of the victims deserve to know who was responsible for their loved ones’ deaths.

Q: What are the implications of the downing of the plane?

The downing of the plane has had a significant impact on the international community. It has increased tensions between Russia and the West, and it has made it more difficult to resolve the conflict in Ukraine. The downing of the plane has also raised questions about the future of international law and the use of force.

the evidence presented in this article does not support the claim that Fitz shot down the plane. While it is possible that Fitz was responsible for the plane’s crash, there is no definitive proof that he did so. The most likely explanation for the crash is that it was caused by a mechanical failure or pilot error.

Author Profile

Dale Richard
Dale Richard
Dale, in his mid-thirties, embodies the spirit of adventure and the love for the great outdoors. With a background in environmental science and a heart that beats for exploring the unexplored, Dale has hiked through the lush trails of the Appalachian Mountains, camped under the starlit skies of the Mojave Desert, and kayaked through the serene waters of the Great Lakes.

His adventures are not just about conquering new terrains but also about embracing the ethos of sustainable and responsible travel. Dale’s experiences, from navigating through dense forests to scaling remote peaks, bring a rich tapestry of stories, insights, and practical tips to our blog.